Review whether the maintenance system supports reliable production.
A maintenance audit evaluates how well work identification, planning, scheduling, execution, documentation, spare parts, preventive maintenance, condition monitoring, reliability analysis, and performance review are functioning together.
Connect maintenance work to equipment risk and production timing.
Maintenance systems work best when planning, scheduling, operators, reliability priorities, and feedback all use the same asset information.
Make maintenance more predictable and easier to sustain.
Clear priorities, standard work, defined ownership, good records, and consistent review reduce the amount of maintenance that becomes reactive.
CRIT-AAudit the Process, Not Just the Paperwork
A strong audit checks whether maintenance work is actually prepared, executed, verified, and improved—not simply documented.
Related Guide →CRIT-BCompare Backlog to Capacity
An aging backlog can reveal a mismatch between work demand, labor capacity, parts availability, and production access.
Related Guide →CRIT-CReview Strategy by Criticality
Critical assets should have maintenance strategies and spare-parts support proportional to their consequence of failure.
Related Guide →CRIT-DLook for Closed-Loop Improvement
Failure history, work-order findings, KPIs, and root-cause actions should change future maintenance decisions.
Related Guide →Visualize work sequence and reliability trend.
These secondary diagrams show sequencing and long-term performance without repeating the hero artwork.
Work sequence.
Maintenance work should move through clear stages from request to preparation, execution, verification, and closeout.
Reliability trend.
Review whether the maintenance system is creating fewer failures and more stable production over time.
Relevant maintenance and reliability resources.
References use approved TempoJS industrial links.